uneg norms and standardsuneg norms and standards

UNEG Norm 1: Internationally agreed principles, goals and targets Within the United Nations system, it is the responsibility of evaluation managers and evaluators to uphold and promote, in their evaluation practice, the principles and values to which the United Nations is committed. UNICEF works in some of the worlds toughest places, to reach the worlds most disadvantaged children. These norms and standards from the United Nations Evaluation Group serve as a key reference for evaluators around the globe. To help them fulfill their potential. Management responses to evaluation recommendations should include specific, time-bound actions with clearly assigned responsibilities to implement them. Evaluation plans should be practical and cost-effective. focusing on delivery of programmes and projects) is an asset. Evaluations should focus on expected and achieved accomplishments, critically examining the presumed causal chains, processes, and attainment of results, as well as the contextual factors that may enhance or impede the achievement of results. evaluation plans, allocate funding, commission evaluators, provide management responses, and learn Department/Office: Kabul, Afghanistan endstream endobj startxref A first DAC-UNEG Peer Review of the evaluation function at the United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF) was conducted in 2006, which led to the preparation of the first evaluation policy for the organization, approved by the UNICEF Executive Board (EB) in 2008. Office; thematic and programmatic evaluation reports and management responses; and. institutional architecture for UNDP and its associated funds and programmes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbkJiMmvKqk. individual evaluation findings are triangulated so as to avoid being based solely on evidence that Evaluators must also be independent from Member State governments. UNCDF and UNV have established evaluation units that commission decentralized evaluations in ways unicef - Evaluation Specialist, P3, Fixed Term, Kabul, Afghanistan In August 2014, UNEG produced "Intergrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluations". Policies and pro - cedures must be clear, transparent and enforceable. The Evaluation Specialist may also be assigned more specific duties that enable her/him to be a resource person across the region, including methodological work, resource mobilization, and procurement support for evaluations. The UNEG Norms and Standards for Evaluation ere updatedw in 2016 and for the first time, included a standalone - Norm on human rights and gender equality. 1982 0 obj <>stream The UNEG norms seek to facilitate system-wide collaboration on evaluation by ensuring that evaluation entities within the United Nations follow agreed-upon basic principles. The Director manages the Office in accordance with UNEG norms and standards and UNDP policies and national evaluation capacity is embraced as a programmatic priority in its own right, in line with PDF UNEG Quality Checklist for Evaluation Reports The term of appointment of the Director is limited to a single, five-year term, non-renewable and Government employees that are considered for employment with UNICEF are normally required to resign from their government before taking up an assignment with UNICEF. results frameworks and theories of change, where available. Job no: 563413 This policy follows the UNEG definition of evaluation as an assessment, as systematic and impartial as possible, of an activity, project, programme, strategy, policy, topic, theme, sector, operational area or institutional performance. It has 45 members and 3 observers listed below.[1]. collection and analysis and establish the relevance and strength of evidence to support conclusions; Provide input to management reports, including relevant sections of the Country Office. These revisions reflect the substantial consensus that evaluatio Tag: UNEG Core Competencies for Evaluators UNEG Foundation Documents, Norms and Standards for Evaluation (2016). the UNDP decentralized evaluation function, and national evaluation capacity programming. The UNEG Norms and Standards highlight the need for people centred evaluation and for evaluators to consider human rights and gender equality in their work but there has continued to be a gap in tools and frameworks for evaluation that fully reflect these considerations. This entails meaningful consultation on such Copyright 2022 ECG. UNICEF is committed to promote the protection and safeguarding of all children. PDF UNEG Standards for Evaluation in the UN System Document Library The IEO's rating system, piloted in 2021, is designed to ensure that criteria and measurements applied are consistent across country programme evaluations. All evaluations carried out by the Independent Evaluation Office are informed by its Evaluation Charter. Copyright 2023 UNEG. Ensure that evaluation findings and lessons learned are incorporated in country programme, Programme Strategy Notes and other planning, and reporting documents. Exercise sufficient oversight that quality is assured, and any quality problems are detected soon enough that timely remedial action is possible. In June 2016, the updated United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) Norms and Standards. The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG), as a group of professional practitioners, undertook to define norms and standards that aim at contributing to the professionalization of the evaluation function and at providing guidance to evaluation offices in preparing their evaluation policies or other aspects of their operations. structural aspects of independence. The purpose of the policy is to establish a common institutional basis for the UNDP evaluation function. Executive Board, taking into account the advice of the Audit and Evaluation Advisory Committee. Evaluation is defined as "an The Independent Evaluation Office is a functionally independent unit within UNDP that supports the Director cannot be dismissed for public statements made in the conduct of his or her work, The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG), as a group of professional practitioners, undertook to define norms and standards that aim at contributing to the professionalization of the. Familiarity with ethics review processes. services (including human resources, administration, financial services, information technology, and The recommendations of the report highlighted the need for structured interaction among UNEG members, annual work planning, work groups to move the agenda forward and developing a website to enhance knowledge sharing. The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) Norms and Standards for Evaluation, adopted in 2005, has served as a landmark document for the United Nations and beyond. Training must be ongoing and comprehensive. Identify the Evaluation objectives, priorities, and activities required for UNICEF in Afghanistan. The UNICEF evaluation policy outlines evaluation principles and procedures, defines key accountabilitiesand more. Home Independent Evaluation Office Policy. Management responses to independent country programme evaluations can be replaced by the new country programme documents, on a case-by-case basis. Quality Checklist for Evaluation Terms of Reference, Resolution Strengthening Voluntary National Reviewsthrough Country-led Evaluation, Disability-Inclusive Evaluations in UNICEF: Guideline for Achieving UNDIS Standards, Guidance and Procedural Note on Managing Real-Time Evaluations Plus (RTE Plus), Procedureon the Implementation of the UNICEF Evaluation Policy, UNICEF Corporate Implementation Framework, Evaluation Management Response: Guidance for UNICEF Staff, Management Response Standard Operating Procedures, Procedure for Ethical Standards in Research, Evaluation, Data Collection and Analysis, Guidance Note: Adolescent participationin UNICEF monitoringand evaluation, Guidance Note for Conducting Evaluability Assessments in UNICEF, Guidance on Gender Integration in Evaluation, Quadrennial comprehensive policy review of operational activities for development of the UN system, Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation, UNEG Evaluation Use in the UN System: Conclusions from the Data, Capacity building for the evaluation of development activities at the country level, UNEG Code of Conduct for Evaluation in the UN System, UNEG Peer Review of the Evaluation Function of UNICEF, Professional Peer Review of the Evaluation Function of UNICEF, Peer Review of the Evaluation Function of UNICEF, Introducing evaluation of humanitarian action, e-Courses programme in Development Evaluation. Please check your email for errors! For the last ten years, it has been used successfully to strengthen and harmonize evaluati. All rights reserved. national ownership and increases the participation of national counterparts, including For the last ten years, it has been used successfully to strengthen and harmonize evaluati Tag: Guidance Norms and Standards UNEG Foundation Documents, UNEG Principles of Working Together (2015). Experience of evaluation in humanitarian settings is value addition. Provide technical support to ensure that a set of evaluation performance indicators is monitored and fed into decision-making processes in the context of the multi-year and annual evaluation plans in EISI, as well as associated office-wide management plans and work plans, ensuring close follow up on the implementation of planned evaluative activities. UNICEF Afghanistan is looking for an experienced professional Evaluation Specialist who will help Country Office to manage its research and evaluation partnerships, including inter-agency relations within the UN, and collaboration with the Regional Office and Headquarters. stakeholders with regular feedback on the consistency or discrepancy between planned and actual discrimination and gender equality. the Board also approves. The Independent Evaluation Office manages a quality assessment system for decentralized evaluations, providing feedback on performance to UNDP bureaux and country offices, and reporting annually to the Executive Board. activities and programme performance, and on the internal and external factors affecting results. It was part of the UN consultative group on programme questions (CCPOQ). Independence also means A synthesis of the main findings, conclusions and taken. PDF Monitoring and Evaluation Policy Framework Find the latest media content on how the UNICEF Evaluation community uses evidence to drive results for every child. They have been subsequently revised at the AGMs in Nairobi (March 2009), Paris (April 2011), Rome (April 2012) and New York (April/May 2015). Office, as an integral division within the overall organizational structure of UNDP, will follow all The norms are consistent with other main sources and reflect the singularity of the United Nations system, characterized by its focus on people and respect for their rights, the importance of international values and principles, universality and neutrality, its multiple stakeholders, its needs for global governance, its multidisciplinarity, and its complex accountability system. UNEG norms and standards, code of conduct and ethical guidelines; Communicating its evaluation findings, conclusions and recommendations through multiple channels and maintaining a searchable, publicly accessible repository of all UNDP, UNCDF and UNV evaluations, and respective management responses and resulting actions; Supporting the development of communities of practice, and partnering with professional within the rules and regulations of the UNDP, and in accordance with United Nations standards of This paper constitutes the continued effort of UNEG to promote the use of evaluation. good practices; Conducting thematic programmatic and other independent evaluations, ensuring strategic and The corporate implementation framework of the evaluation policy sets out specific actions required by various actors within UNICEF to implement the policy. Advertised: Jun 26 2023 Afghanistan Standard Time UNEG and UN oversight functions A factual description, together with an assessment of the status, practices and lessons learned. The Bureau works with the monitoring and evaluation staff of UNDP units to ensure that evaluation plans are properly implemented. The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) is a platform for the different United Nations (UN) evaluation offices to discuss evaluation issues and to share evaluation knowledge. Resources are allocated to evaluation through a series of priorities, the evaluation function is an effective country-led vehicle for greater citizen UNEG Norms and Standards for Evaluation [2016] These norms and standards from the United Nations Evaluation Group serve as a key reference for evaluators around the globe. The Evaluation Specialist is responsible for contributing to the design and effective conduct and uptake of evaluations in accordance with the UNICEF evaluation policy. The UNSDG guides, supports, tracks and oversees the coordination of development operations in 162 countries and territories. This guidance note is intended for UNICEF headquarters, regional and country office staff for planning, managing and participating in a Real-Time Evaluation Plus of UNICEFs Humanitarian Responses. It will likewise be entitled to benefit from the same support In 2013, following another review of the function, the UNICEF Executive Board (EB) approved a Revised Evaluation Policy (REP), which required UNICEF to undertake a peer review of the implementation of the policy after two years. programmatic and country-level evaluations carried out by the Independent Evaluation Office, on the Categories: Research, Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation. "Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluations" is available at: http://www.unevaluation.org/document/detail/1616, 220 East 42nd Street, Room 2036 Evaluation methodology. Copyright 2023 United Nations Sustainable Development Group. All rights reserved. The evaluation function at UNICEF works worldwide to conduct dozens of evaluations each year. The new Norm on human rights and gender equality calls on evaluators and evaluation managers to ensure that these values are The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) Norms and Standards for Evaluation, adopted in 2005, has served as a landmark document for the United Nations and beyond. Executive Board at each annual session as part of its annual report on evaluation. provides legitimacy to evaluation and reduces the potential for conflicts of interest. Experience in evaluation design and in conducting evaluations as per UNICEF and UNEG norms and standards for Evaluation in the UN System in an advantage; Familiarity with methods used in conducting both up-stream evaluations (e.g., focusing on policies, strategies and systems), as well as down-stream evaluations (e.g. >, Independent Country Programme Evaluations, Global and Regional Programme Evaluations, Evaluations Commissioned by UNDP Programme Units, Programme of Assistance to the Palestinian People, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, I. Position type: Fixed Term Appointment for evaluations should take into account relevant results frameworks approved by the Executive In addition to learning, evaluations help hold UNDP and its associated programmes and funds accordance with UNDP Executive Board decisions (evaluation reports will be issued under the These are: A comprehensive and strategic evaluation plan should contain an appropriate mix of programme The Director has the freedom to engage directly with external stakeholders in the course of The Evaluation Specialist is expected to be a well-informed focal point on a range of learning options and themes, and a first point of contact for the COs to arrange upskilling efforts. The guiding principles stem from General Assembly resolutions, Executive Board decisions and the norms and standards of the. The Evaluation Guidelines give renewed emphasis to the importance of planning for evaluations and ensuring . Emphasis should be placed on the development of well-crafted terms of reference. Experience in these areas cannot be substituted for the Evaluation experience but is an advantage. Its genesis owes much to the work of the Joint Inspection Unit (JIU) in particular Inspector Earl Sohm, JIU/REP/85/10 and JIU/REP/85/11. Independent Evaluation Office or consultants, must conduct evaluations in line with the UNEG Ethical Evaluation Competency Framework With respect to evaluation, the Committee will review and advise the Administrator on: appointment and dismissal of the Director of the Independent Evaluation Office; multi-year and annual work plans, budget, and periodic reports of the Independent Evaluation Evaluators must understand the difference between independently verified and Preamble The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG), as a group of professional practitioners, undertook to define norms and standards that aim at contributing to the professionalization of. Across 190 countries and territories, we work for every child, everywhere, every day, to build a better world for everyone. endstream endobj 1957 0 obj <>/Metadata 142 0 R/Names 1975 0 R/PageLabels 1945 0 R/Pages 1948 0 R/StructTreeRoot 248 0 R/Type/Catalog/ViewerPreferences<>>> endobj 1958 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageC]/Properties<>/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 4/TrimBox[0.0 0.0 612.0 792.0]/Type/Page>> endobj 1959 0 obj <>stream PDF Standards for Evaluation in the UN System - United Nations Office on PDF Revised Evaluation Policy of UNICEF #PcGW=&F|rT|59f5+zlRV?Mv2n Dismissal of the Director due to poor performance, misconduct or malfeasance, shall follow UNDP be adjusted annually through a costed programme of work presented to the Executive Board in The status of implementation of this policy is reported by the Independent Evaluation Office to the The UNICEF family is committed to include everyone, irrespective of their race/ethnicity, age, disability, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, nationality, socio-economic background, or any other personal characteristic.We offer a wide range of benefits to our staff, including paid parental leave, breastfeeding breaks and reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities. A strong culture of evaluation is a prerequisite for a learning organization. Identify gaps in knowledge and work with sector managers to ensure these are addressed and facilitate cross-sectoral collaboration. Build and strengthen strategic partnerships through networking and advocacy with local/national governments and sub-regional governmental bodies, UN system agency partners, donors, NGOs, funding organization, research institutes, including universities, and the private sector. All selected candidates will, therefore, undergo rigorous reference and background checks, and will be expected to adhere to these standards and principles. Learn how and when to remove this template message, Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Preparatory Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Civil Aviation Organization, International Fund for Agricultural Development, International Organisation for Cooperation in Evaluation, Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, United Nations Department of Public Information, United Nations Department for Safety and Security, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, United Nations Department for General Assembly and Conference Management, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, United Nations Human Settlements Programme, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services, United Nations Peace Building Support Office - Financing for Peacebuilding, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Nations_Evaluation_Group&oldid=955508869, This page was last edited on 8 May 2020, at 06:08. All evaluations must be independent, and this independence has both ethical and structural Explore our collection of webinars and other video resources. It complements the UNEG's Handbook "Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation: Towards UNEG Guidance," and provides additional theoretical and applied information, tools and suggestions. representative coverage of UNDP programmes and results against national, regional and global International Civil Service. UNEG_Norms_2005-FINAL.pdf (500 KB / English). Read how the Evaluation Office turns policy into practice. self-reported data. %PDF-1.6 % Explore and easily find UNSDG publications. The ten general norms should be upheld in the conduct of any evaluation; the four institutional norms should be reflected in the management and governance of evaluation functions. Foster policy-level and academic partnerships to support national evaluation capacity development initiatives. These standards serve as a guideline for UNICEF staff in the preparation and assessment of evaluation reports. bureaux and country offices), on the other. The eolving context and the increasing demands for accountability and national owndership in evaluation requrie an updated Norms and Standards document in order to ensure its continued relevance in guiding and further strengthening evalutaion practices. for Evaluation was released. They provide a reference for strengthening, professionalizing and improving the quality of evaluation in all entities of the United Nations system. The OECD-DAC Network on Development Evaluation (EvalNet) and the UN Evaluation Group (UNEG) maintain a Joint Task Force to support professional Peer Reviews of the evaluation function of UN organizations. the organization, in accordance with the Executive Board-approved financial appropriation organizational learning. for Independent Evaluation Office, and reports to the Board annually on the volume of Meaningful consultation with UNDP management and other stakeholders is essential for the credibility and utility of independent evaluations. The United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) Norms and Standards for Evaluation, adopted in 2005, has served as a landmark document for the United Nations and beyond. Policy and Strategy evaluation were paid insufficient attention initially. This procedure provides UNICEF staff with the requirements for implementing the evaluation policy, ensuring the organization and partners use evaluation for learning, continuous improvement and strengthened accountability. 10 Including decision-making for policy development, strategic planning and programme improvement. It suggests norms and standards for all evaluation offices in the UN and delivers thematic reports concerning monitoring and evaluation.It has 45 members and 3 observers listed below. This course complement the e-learning course on the decentralized evaluation function at UNICEF and provides an orientation to the evaluation process in humanitarian situations. report will be critiqued by the Audit and Evaluation Advisory Committee and should include the Oops! evaluation of UNDP performance; and. of aid effectiveness particularly national ownership and mutual accountability. UNICEF strongly encourages the use of flexible working arrangements. Assist the Country Office to monitor and report on the implementation of agreed management response actions. The rationale for evaluations should be stated clearly from the outset. Exposure to mobile technology platforms, big data and other innovative techniques. and is accountable to the UNDP Executive Board. Evaluation Capacity Strengthening and Partnership Building. oversight and accountability functions of the Executive Board and the management of UNDP, UNCDF and UNEG Principles of Working Together (2022). Vital attributes such as For the last ten years, it has been used successfully to strengthen and harmonize evaluation practice and has served as a key reference for evaluators around the globe. Staff with a vested Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation - Towards It is a living document, updated in consultation with UNEG members when required. Detail of Norms and Standards for Evaluation (2016) evaluations. Ensure that evaluation capacities of Country Office staff and national partners including government and civil society are strengthened, enabling them to increasingly engage in and lead evidence generating processes. learned from the independent and decentralized evaluations conducted each year. applicable UNDP rules and procedures. The work of the Office includes: Developing evaluation standards, procedures, criteria and methodological guidance for UNDP The scope, design and implementation of an evaluation However, the last decade has witnessed many changes in global, regional and national contexts and in the practice of evaluation. The structural independence of the Office underpins and guarantees its freedom to conduct Notwithstanding its independence as enshrined in this revised evaluation policy, the Independent Evaluation This document is a revision of the original document and was approved at the UNEG AGM 2020. To eliminate conflict and duplication in the U.S. voluntary standards development process, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) was formed in 1918 by five professional/technical societies and three federal government agencies. Each Peer Review (PR) is intended to identify good practice and opportunities to further strengthen the evaluation function in the agency under review, with a view to contributing ultimately to improved performance in international development cooperation and humanitarian assistance. Coordinate with partners to ensure that research and assessment systems are properly designed, and that data collection and analysis from field visits are coordinated and standardised across programmes with special attention to humanitarian response.